PT155.S3.P1.Q7 > Analytics

Hide analysis

The following passage is adapted from a 2001 article by a film historian.

██ ██████████ █████ ██ █████████████ ██ █ ████████ █ ███████ ██ ████████ ██████████ ███████ ████████ ███████ ███ █████ █████ ██████ ██ █████████ █████████ ███

Question · Which works of art should be shown together?

██ ████ ███████████ ███ █████████ ██ █████ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ██████ ███ ████████ ██ █████ ████ ██ ██████████ ██ ███████████ ██████████ ███

Answer 1 · Group art according to artist

E.g. Rembrandt paintings

███████ ██████████ ██████ █████ ██ ██ ██████ █████████ ████ █ ██████████ █████ ██ ██ █ ██████████ ██████████ ███████ ███ ████████ ██████████ ███

Answer 2 · Group art according to theme/period

E.g., Modernist art

██ ███ █████ ███ ███ ██ ██ ██████ █ ██████ ██ █████ ████ █████████ ██ ███████ ███

Similarity · Both answers use common characteristics to group art togther

Analogy · Film retrospectives are like art exhibits

Similar works of film are grouped by a common feature and screened together

██ ██████ █████ █ ███████████ ██ █████ ██████████ ██████████ ████ ███ ████ ██████ ██████ ███ ████ █████ ████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ████ ███████ ███████████████

narrowing topic · Early nonfiction film retrospectives

Main point / author's criticism · Early films shouldn't be grouped by similarity

Premise: such films were never originally shown this way

█████████ ████████ ███████ █████ █████ ████ ██ ███ █████ █████ ████ █████ ████ █████ ███████ ████████ ██ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███████ █████ ██████ ███ ██████████ ███ ██████████ ██ █████ ██████████ ████ ███ ███ ███████ ████ ████ ███████████ ██████████ █████ ████ ██████ ████ ██████████ ██████ ███ ████ ████████████ █████ ███████████ █████ ███ █ ██████████ ██ ███████ █████ ████████ █████████ ████ ██████ ██████ ███ █ ███████ ████ ███ █ ███ ██ ██████████ ████ ██████ ███ ████████ ██ ███████████ ███ █████ ████ ████ ███ █████ █ █████ ███████ ███ ███ █████

Support criticism · Original format for screening films

Author gives more detail: instead of grouping similar films together, cinemas originally showed different films together in "mixed program"

target of criticism · Film archives and retrospective festivals

Their priority is to showcase how films supposedly originally looked; author implies this shouldn't be sole priority

support criticism · Authenticity in how films were originally grouped is important

Screening films in mixed-program format adds context and improves viewing experience

clarify main point · Exhibition of early films shouldn't ignore the context in which they were originally viewed

Passage Style

Problem-analysis

Single position

It can be inferred from ███ ███████ ████ ███ ██████ █████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ █████ █████████ ███ ███████████ █████ █████████ ██ ███ █████ ██████████

Question Type

Author’s perspective

Implied

They are usually ██████ ████ ████ ██████ █████████ ████████ ███ ███ ████████ ███████ ██ ████████ ██████

The author never suggests that director’s cuts are motivated by marketing or that they have no artistic value. He just thinks that there’s more to authenticity than simply restoring films as directors’ cuts.

Producing them is ███████ █ █████████ █████████ ██ ████ ██ ██ ████████ ███ █ ████ ████ ███ █████ ██ █████ █████████

The author never suggests that directors’ cuts can never meet their goal. As far as we can tell, the goal is restore films “as they supposedly were when originally produced.” The author doesn’t consider whether or not that goal is achievable.

Paradoxically, even though ████ ███ ████████ ██ ██ ███████ ██ ████████ █████████████ ██ ████ █████ ████ ███ ████ █████████ ████ █████ █████████

The author never suggests any opinion on how authentic directors’ cuts actually are. He just thinks that there’s more to authenticity than simply restoring films as directors’ cuts.

46%

The time and ██████ ████████ ██ █████████ ████ ██ ███████████ ██████ ██ ██ █████████ ██ ████ ██ █████ ███████ ██ █████████████

The author says these cuts are presented as “authentic” because they’re accurate restorations of the films themselves. But he thinks that when talking about authenticity, we need to consider not just the films themselves, but the context in which they were watched. The point of the passage is that this context is extremely important. So he’d likely agree that if we don’t pay attention to context, the effort to create an “authentic” director’s cut won’t succeed at conveying that film in an authentic way.

48%

In the vast ████████ ██ █████ █████ ████ █ ███████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██████████ ██ ███ ███ ████ ███ ██ ██████████ ███ █████

The author doesn’t suggest whether directors’ cuts are a better way to experience films.

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

It takes about five minutes.

Take the free diagnostic

More free LSAT prep: Sample LSAT questions Full-length diagnostic & practice test All free LSAT resources

PrepTest 155 - Section 3 - Passage 1 - Question 7

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Confirm action

PrepTest 155 - Section 3 - Passage 1 - Question 7

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Want to know why the right answer is right?