I promised Bernie that I would answer his question. ██ █████ ██ ███████ ███ ███████ ███ ████ █████████ █ █████████████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ █████ ███████ █ ███ ████████ ███ █ █████ ███████████ ██ █████ ███████ ██ ██ █ ██████ ███ █ █████ ████ ███ █████████ ██ ██ █████████ ██ ██ ██ ████████ ███ ███ ██████ ███ ████ █ ██████████ █████ █ █████████ ██ ███████ ██ ███████
The author concludes that she fulfilled her promise to Bernie. Because that promise was that she would answer Bernie’s question, the conclusion can be understood as, “I answered Bernie’s question.”
The support for this conclusion is the fact that, after Bernie asked whether his project had been approved, the author responded with “I would approve it if I could, but I don’t have the authority to do—that is up to Dorothy, and she hasn’t yet made a decision.” The author actually misinterpreted Bernie’s question, but still let Bernie know that his project had not been approved yet.
The conclusion is that the author “answered Bernie’s question.” But if the author responded based on a misinterpretation of the question, did she really “answer Bernie’s question”? That’s the issue in this argument. We want to establish that the author did in fact answer Bernie’s question.
Which one of the following, ██ ████████ ███████ ███ ██████████ █████ ██ ██ ████████ ██████
All there is ██ █████████ █ ████████ ██ ██████ ███ ██████████ ███ ███████████ ██████████
No person can ██ ████ ███████████ ███ ███████ ████████ ██████████
The person responsible ███ █ ████████ ██ ███ ███ ███ ██████ ███████ ███ █████████
One need not ███████ █ ███████ ██ █████ ██ ██ ███ ████ ████ █████ ██ ████ ██ ███████ ███
Making a promise ██████ ███████ █ ██████ ██ ████ ███