No flaw. This interprets a conditional chain correctly. The premises establish that a film with a good story will do well at the box office, so it follows that this film did not have a good story since it did not do well at the box office.

This mistakes a sufficient condition for a necessary condition. It establishes that a film will have a long run if it features several stars, but it does not establish that this is the only way for it to have a long run.

Wrong flaw. This interprets a conditional chain in the wrong direction by affirming the necessary (the film did well on video). The stimulus, in contrast, negates the sufficient (the film was not accepted).

Wrong flaw. This establishes conditions that do not link up. A star being nominated for an award is not the same as a start receiving an award. This is a distinct flaw from the stimulus, which properly establishes a conditional chain but goes wrong when it negates a sufficient condition (the film was not accepted).

No flaw. This properly triggers a conditional chain. If a film has a big budget, then it will be heavily promoted, meaning it will be released country-wide at once. The conclusion that this big-budgeted film will be released country-wide follows logically.