Political arguments about biodiversity and the preservation of endangered species generally assume we know what a species is. ███ █████████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ███████████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ████ ████ █ █████████ ███ █████████████ █████████ ███
Context ·What's a "species"? Arguments about biodiversity assume we know this.
Sibley's potential response ·Acknowledges that "species concept" is slippery
However, for practical reasons, we have to limit the number of species we recognize. (If we said you were a different species from your mom, because you have slightly different DNA, that would lead to billions of different "species" in the world. That's impractical.)
Implications of debate ·How we answer the species question has political and economic consequences
Example: Increasing number of species would likely increase number of endangered species.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
15.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ █████████ ███ ████ █████ ██ ███ ████████
Question Type
Main point
The main point of this Debate passage is the debate between two different perspectives for classifying species. While the debate is not resolved in this passage, the author notes that the debate has real-world implications.
This is descriptively inaccurate. The author says that Sibley’s work isn’t widely accepted, not that Sibley’s work brought the debate closer to resolution.
We know that one critic thinks that interpreting differences between populations is arbitrary, but we don’t know that most agree with this claim. Also, (B) only talks about P3, so it can’t be the main idea of the passage as a whole.
This is the main point of the passage. P1-P3 outline the debate between the lumpers and the splitters over the controversial issue of species classification, and P4 describes the practical implications of the debate.
The main point of this passage is not that Sibley has questioned a traditional view. Instead, the main point is the general debate between the lumpers and the splitters. Sibley’s view serves as an example of the splitter perspective that shows how the different perspectives yield different outcomes for species classification. The passage opens and closes with the general debate about species classification, which can help clue us in to the overall main point.
e
Charles G. Sibley █████████ █████████████ ███████ ██ ███████████ ██████████ ███████████ ████ ████████ ███ █████ ███████ ████ ███ ████ ██████ █████████
The main point of this passage is not that Sibley’s methods are revolutionary. Instead, the main point is the general debate between the lumpers and the splitters. Sibley’s view is just an example of one of the two general perspectives; his method is not the main point of the passage.
Difficulty
83% of people who answer get this correct
This is a slightly challenging question.
It is significantly easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%127
140
75%152
Analysis
Main point
Critique or debate
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
1%
147
b
5%
154
c
83%
161
d
6%
154
e
5%
154
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.