Political arguments about biodiversity and the preservation of endangered species generally assume we know what a species is. ███ █████████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ███████████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ████ ████ █ █████████ ███ █████████████ █████████ ███
Context ·What's a "species"? Arguments about biodiversity assume we know this.
Sibley's potential response ·Acknowledges that "species concept" is slippery
However, for practical reasons, we have to limit the number of species we recognize. (If we said you were a different species from your mom, because you have slightly different DNA, that would lead to billions of different "species" in the world. That's impractical.)
Implications of debate ·How we answer the species question has political and economic consequences
Example: Increasing number of species would likely increase number of endangered species.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
16.
According to the passage, which ███ ██ ███ █████████ ██ ████ ██ ███ ████████████ ███████ ████████
Question Type
Stated
This is a Stated question about the phylogenetic species concept. This is discussed at the end of P1. We see that the phylogenetic species concept is supported by the splitters.
a
It has effectively ███████████ █████ ███████ ██ ███████ ███████████████
Unsupported. The only methods for species classification described in the passage are the method of the lumpers and the method of the splitters. The lumpers use the biological species concept, while the splitters use the phylogenetic species concept. The passage doesn’t indicate that the splitters have discredited the lumpers, so (A) isn’t supported.
b
Its popularity has ████████ █████ ███ █████ ██ ███████ ██ ███████
Unsupported. We don’t know how the popularity of the splitter perspective (or the phylogenetic species concept) has changed specifically since Sibley’s death.
c
It is more ██████ ██ ███████████ ████ ██ ████ █████ ██████████ █████████
Unsupported. The passage doesn’t compare classification methods that are useful for ornithology with methods that are useful for most other biological sciences, so this comparative statement doesn’t have support.
d
It has more ██████████ ███ ████ ██ ███ ██ ███ █████
This is stated in P1. Here, we see that the phylogenetic species concept is increasingly popular.
e
It was pioneered ██ ███████ ██ ███████
Unsupported. We know that Sibley can be called a splitter, but the passage doesn’t indicate that he came up with the phylogenetic species concept.
Difficulty
69% of people who answer get this correct
This is a difficult question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%145
153
75%161
Analysis
Stated
Critique or debate
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
8%
149
b
1%
155
c
8%
152
d
69%
163
e
14%
156
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.