Political arguments about biodiversity and the preservation of endangered species generally assume we know what a species is. ███ █████████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ███████████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ████ ████ █ █████████ ███ █████████████ █████████ ███
Context ·What's a "species"? Arguments about biodiversity assume we know this.
Sibley's potential response ·Acknowledges that "species concept" is slippery
However, for practical reasons, we have to limit the number of species we recognize. (If we said you were a different species from your mom, because you have slightly different DNA, that would lead to billions of different "species" in the world. That's impractical.)
Implications of debate ·How we answer the species question has political and economic consequences
Example: Increasing number of species would likely increase number of endangered species.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
18.
Which one of the following ████ ██████████ ███████████ ███ ██████████ ███████ ████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████████
Question Type
Application
This is an Application question. Here, we are looking for an example that illustrates the biological species concept, which is the theory used by lumpers. Those who use the biological species concept define a distinct species as a population that doesn’t interbreed with other populations in the wild. We are looking for an example that illustrates this definition accurately.
It’s the phylogenetic species concept (used by splitters), not the biological species concept (used by lumpers) that cares about common ancestors. (A) doesn’t say whether or not populations X and Y reproduce with each other, so we don’t know how to classify them based on the biological species concept.
According to the biological species concept, a species is a group that is reproductively isolated from other groups. In (B), X and Y interbreed in the wild, so they’re not reproductively isolated from each other. Because of this, we should not classify them as different species under the biological species concept. (B) says that they should be classified as different species, so (B) doesn’t accurately apply the biological species concept.
The biological species concept is about reproductive isolation, not about appearance. (C) doesn’t tell us if the two populations reproduce with each other, so we don’t know how to classify them according to the biological species concept.
According to the biological species concept, a species is a group that is reproductively isolated from other groups. In the example in (D), populations X and Y are not reproductively isolated from each other, so they should be classified as belonging to the same species. (D) accurately applies the biological species concept.
The biological species concept is about reproductive isolation, not about appearance. (E) says that the two populations have never been known to interbreed, so we should not classify them as the same species according to the biological species concept. Additionally, it’s the phylogenetic species concept (used by splitters), not the biological species concept (used by lumpers) that cares about common ancestors.
Difficulty
62% of people who answer get this correct
This is a difficult question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%148
156
75%163
Analysis
Application
Critique or debate
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
5%
151
b
4%
156
c
15%
156
d
62%
164
e
13%
153
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.