Political arguments about biodiversity and the preservation of endangered species generally assume we know what a species is. ███ █████████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ███████████ █ ██████ ███████ ███ ████ ████ █ █████████ ███ █████████████ █████████ ███
Context ·What's a "species"? Arguments about biodiversity assume we know this.
Sibley's potential response ·Acknowledges that "species concept" is slippery
However, for practical reasons, we have to limit the number of species we recognize. (If we said you were a different species from your mom, because you have slightly different DNA, that would lead to billions of different "species" in the world. That's impractical.)
Implications of debate ·How we answer the species question has political and economic consequences
Example: Increasing number of species would likely increase number of endangered species.
Passage Style
Critique or debate
19.
If valid, Charles G. Sibley's █████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ████ ███ █████████ ██ ███ ██████ ██████████ ████ █████████ █████████ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ ███████████
Question Type
Implied
This is an Inference question from Sibley’s findings. At the end of P2, we see that Sibley found that North and South American vultures are more similar to storks than to European vultures, and that loons and grebes aren’t closely related.
a
A stork population ████ ██████ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ███ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ████ █████ ████████
Sibley’s findings in P2 distinguish between vultures from Europe and vultures from North or South America, not storks from different locations. The passage just talks about storks in general; we don’t know how to classify storks from different locations.
b
A stork population ████ █████ ███████ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ █ █████████ ███████ ████ ███ ████ ███████
Sibley’s findings in P2 distinguish between vultures from Europe and vultures from North or South America, not storks from these locations. The passage just talks about storks in general; we don’t know how to classify storks from different locations.
c
A vulture population ████ █████ ███████ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ███ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ████ ███████
Sibley’s findings show that North American vultures are more closely related to storks than to European vultures. If we classify storks and vultures as different species, Sibley probably doesn’t think that vultures from North America are the same species as vultures from Europe, since the North American vultures are more closely related to storks than they are to the European vultures.
d
A vulture population ████ █████ ███████ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ █ █████████ ███████ ████ ███ ████ ███████
Sibley’s findings don’t challenge this assertion because Sibley found that South American vultures are less closely related to European vultures. If we say that vultures and storks are different species, then Sibley would agree that vultures from South America are probably a different species from vultures from Europe.
e
A vulture population ████ █████ ███████ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ███ ████ ███████ ██ ███ ████ █████ ████████
The passage doesn’t distinguish North American vultures from South American vultures, so we don’t know whether or not Sibley’s findings challenge this assertion.
Difficulty
66% of people who answer get this correct
This is a difficult question.
It is similar in difficulty to other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%142
153
75%164
Analysis
Implied
Critique or debate
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
5%
154
b
4%
151
c
66%
163
d
20%
157
e
6%
152
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.