Conclusion Some of the rare pygmy bears should be moved from their native island to the neighboring island. ███ █████ ████ ██████████ ████ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ██ █████ ██████ ███████ ███ █████ ███ ███████████ ██████ ██ ███ ████ █████ ████ ███ █ ███████ ████████ ████ ████ ██████████ ███ ████ ██████ ██████ ██ ██████ █████ ████████ ████████
The author concludes that some of the bears should be moved from their native island to the neighboring island.
Why?
Because the bears risk extinction from habitat loss on their native island.
And, the neighboring island is the only place that has a similar habitat. This is why the move is the only viable chance of saving the bears.
The conclusion asserts that some of the bears “should” be moved. But we don’t get in the support any statement that tells us when we know that the bears should be moved. We want a principle that connects the premises to the conclusion. For example:
If moving the bears to a neighboring island is the only viable chance of saving the bears, then the bears should be moved.
Note that the correct answer could look very different from this. It might bring in other parts of the support, or it might just be phrased in an odd way. Let’s keep an open mind.
Which one of the following ███████████ ██ ██████ ████ █████ ██ ███████ ███ █████████ ██████
Some species are ████ █████████ ██ ██████████ ████ ███ █████ ████████
Rare animals should ███ ██ █████ ████ ███ ███████ ██ ███████ ██████ █████ ████████ ███ ███████ ██ ███ ████████
If a species ██ ██ ██████ ██ ███████████ ████████ ██ ████ ██████ ██ ███████ ███ ██████████ ██████ ██ ███████████
The rarer a ███████ ██ █████ ██ ██████ ███ ███ ████ ████ ██████ ██ ████ ██ ███████ ████ ████████
If an animal's ████████ ███████ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ █████ ██ ██ ███████████ ██ ███ ██ ████ █ ███ ███████ ███ ███ ███████