Nuclear fusion is a process whereby the nuclei of atoms are joined, or “fused,” and in which energy is released. ███ ██ ███ ███████████ ██ ██████ ██ ████████ ████ █ ██████ ██████ ██████████ ███ █████████ █████ ███████████ █████ █████████ ██ █ ██████ ██████ ███ █████ ████ ██ █████ █████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ███████ ████████ ██ █████████ ██████████ ██████████ █████ ███ ███████████ █ ██████████ ██████ ██ ████████ ███ ███ █████ ██ ███ ███ ██ ███ ████████ ███ █████████████ █████ ████ ████████ ██ ███████ ██ █████ ██████████ ████ ██████ ███ ████ █████████
The stimulus gives us some context about the process of nuclear fusion. For our purposes, the most important thing stated here is that this process produces helium-4 gas as a by-product. We're then given details about a fusion experiment. The exact details don't matter. What we're interested in is the fact that the experimenters found a measurable quantity of helium-4 gas after the experiment, and used that as evidence to claim that they had achieved fusion.
We're trying to weaken the experimenters' argument. On the basis of finding helium-4 gas, which is a by-product of nuclear fusion, the experimenters claim to have achieved nuclear fusion. But this is a version of sufficiency/necessity confusion: just because nuclear fusion produces helium-4 gas (NF → H4) doesn't mean the presence of helium-4 is only caused by nuclear fusion, or guarantees that nuclear fusion has occurred, as the experimenters assume (H4 → NF). A good way to weaken this argument would be to target this assumption by suggesting an alternative explanation for the presence of helium-4 gas.
Which one of the following, ██ █████ █████ ████ █████ ██ ███ ████████████████ ███████████
Helium-4 was not ███ ████ ███ █████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████████
This wouldn't weaken the experimenters' conclusion. We already know the chamber was filled with "air" to begin with, which suggests the presence of gases that aren't helium-4. In any case, the experimenters' conclusion doesn't require helium-4 to have been the "only" gas found, so this doesn't weaken their argument.
When fusion is █████████ ██ ████████ ████████ ███████ ████████████ █████████ ███████ ███ █████ █████
This doesn't weaken the argument. We're never told that these other by-products, tritium and gamma rays, are not present. We're just told that one by-product of fusion, helium-4, is present. To undermine this argument, we'd want another explanation for the presence of helium-4 that doesn't involve nuclear fusion. This answer choice doesn't give us that.
The amount of ████████ █████ ██ ███ ███████████ ███ ███ ███ ██████ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ ████ ██ █████ ██ ████████ ████
This would weaken the argument. We know the chamber was filled with "air" to begin with, so this answer choice suggests that the helium-4 in the chamber could have been there from the start, and not a by-product of nuclear fusion. This effectively weakens the experimenters' argument.
Helium-4 gas rapidly ██████ █████ ███████ ████████ ██████ ███ █████ █ ███ ██████
This doesn't weaken the argument. This just tells us that, in order to have detected any helium-4 gas at all, the experimenters most likely measured the helium-4 level soon after the experiment, not several hours later. But that doesn't explain why the helium-4 is there in the first place, let alone provide an alternative explanation besides nuclear fusion.
Nuclear fusion reactions ███ █████████████ ██ ███ ███████ ██ █████ ███████ ██ █████
This would only weaken the experimenters' argument if we were explicitly told that a large amount of heat was not produced. Since we're not told this, we still have to explain the presence of helium-4, a potential by-product of fusion. This answer choice doesn't suggest an alternative explanation to the experimenters'.
Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.
It takes about five minutes.
Take the free diagnosticWant to know why the right answer is right?
7Sage membership unlocks explanations of every question. Every answer choice. On every official PrepTest. Start with a free account.