Advertisers are often criticized for their unscrupulous manipulation of people’s tastes and wants. █████ ██ █████████ ████████ ████ ████ ███████████ ███ █████████ ██ █████ ██ ████ ██ █████████ ███████████████ █ ██████████ ███████████ ███████ ██ ██████ ███ █████ ████ █████ █ ██████ █████████ ██ █████████████ ██ ███ ███ █████████ ████ █████████ ██ █ █████████ ███████████ ████ ███████████ ████████ █████ ██████████████ ████ ███ ████████████ ███ ████ ████ ████ ████ ███████ ████ ███████ ███████████ ██ ██████████ █████████ █████████
While the argument's main conclusion is technically the idea that "there is evidence…that some advertisers are motivated by moral…considerations," the important reasoning comes in how it supports its subsidiary conclusion. That reasoning follows the phenomenon-hypothesis structure:
Phenomenon: When a publication changed its image from family-friendly to sex and violence, some advertisers withdrew their ads.
—
Hypothesis: The advertisers withdrew their ads because of moral considerations.
A keen focus on this argument's causal reasoning helps narrow our anticipation: we're looking for an answer choice that eliminates an alternate explanation or bolsters the plausibility of the argument's proposed explanation.
Analysis by MichaelWright
Which one of the following, ██ █████ █████ ████ ██████████ ███ █████████
The advertisers switched █████ ██████████████ ██ █████ ██████ ███████████
Some advertisers switched ████ ██████ ██████████ ██ █████████ ██ ███ ███████ ████████████
The advertisers expected █████ ███████ █████ ██ ████████ ██ ████ ██████ ████ ███ ███████ ████████████ ███ ██ ████████ ██ ████ █████████
People who generally ████ ██████ ██████████ ███ ███ ██████ ██ ███ ██████████ ████ ███████████ ██ ███ ███ █████████
It was expected ████ ███ ███████ ███████████ █████ ██████ ███████████ ██ █████ ██ █ █████████ ██████ ██████