LSAT 64 – Section 3 – Question 26

LSAT 64 - Section 3 - Question 26

October 2011

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Target time: 1:38

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question
QuickView		 Type Tags Answer
Choices		 Curve Question
Difficulty		 Psg/Game/S
Difficulty		 Explanation
PT64 S3 Q26
+LR
Sufficient assumption +SA
A
11%
161
B
8%
160
C
17%
163
D
14%
162
E
50%
168
156
165
175
 +Hardest 146.872 +SubsectionMedium

Original statement:
it is rational not to acquire such info unless one expects that the benefits of doing so will outweigh the cost and difficulty of doing so

Two ideas:
rational not acquire info
expects benefits outweigh c&d

Group 3 Rule: negate sufficient
[not] expects benefits outweigh c&d --> rational not acquire info

Contrapositive:
[not] rational not acquire info --> expects benefits outweigh c&d

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 64 Explanations

Section 1 - Logical Reasoning

Section 2 - Logic Games

Section 3 - Logical Reasoning

Section 4 - Reading Comprehension

Get full LSAT course

Leave a Reply