LSAT 108 – Section 3 – Question 06
You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 1:08
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT108 S3 Q06 |
+LR
| Except +Exc Resolve reconcile or explain +RRE | A
1%
152
B
0%
160
C
76%
167
D
22%
162
E
1%
166
|
137 151 164 |
+Medium | 147.273 +SubsectionMedium |
"Surprising" Phenomenon
Why were fewer bass caught after the power plant started discharging wastewater into the river?
Objective
The correct answer must fail to explain why fewer bass were caught downstream. Meanwhile, every wrong answer will state a difference between the periods before and after the power plant opened that implies bass were more scarce afterward, or that bass present were caught at a lower rate.
A
The discharged wastewater made the river more attractive to fish that are the natural predators of bass.
This would explain why fewer bass were caught after the power plant opened. Their predators became more prevalent, so the number of bass declined.
B
The discharged water was warmer than the normal river temperature, leading the bass to seek cooler water elsewhere.
This would explain why fewer bass were caught after the power plant opened. They fled for cooler water, decreasing their numbers in that part of the river.
C
Because of the new plant, access to the part of the river downstream from the plant was improved, leading to an increase in the number of anglers fishing for bass.
This does not explain the decrease because more anglers would cause more bass to be caught. This would contribute to an increase in the number of bass caught, not a decrease.
D
Because of the new plant, the level of noise downstream increased, making that section of the river a less popular place for anglers to fish.
This would explain why fewer bass were caught downstream. There may be no fewer bass, but the number of anglers fishing for them decreased, leading to fewer bass being caught overall.
E
The discharged wastewater created turbulence that disrupted the vegetation of the river downstream, destroying some of the bass’s natural habitat.
This would explain why fewer bass were caught downstream. Their habitat was destroyed, so bass perished or fled, leading to a decrease in their population.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 108 Explanations
Section 1 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Section 2 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
Section 3 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.