LSAT 114 – Section 4 – Question 15
You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 1:44
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT114 S4 Q15 |
+LR
| Weaken +Weak Causal Reasoning +CausR Sampling +Smpl Math +Math | A
7%
157
B
8%
158
C
11%
158
D
70%
164
E
4%
156
|
140 152 164 |
+Medium | 144.851 +SubsectionEasier |
Summarize Argument: Phenomenon-Hypothesis
The author hypothesizes that juvenile Pacific loggerhead turtles that feed near the Baja peninsula hatch 10,000 kilometers away, near Japan. As support for this hypothesis, the author says that 95% of the DNA from these turtles near the Baja peninsula matches the DNA of the turtles near Japan.
Notable Assumptions
The author assumes that a 95% DNA match is enough to conclude that different turtles belong to the same group.
A
Nesting sites of loggerhead turtles have been found off the Pacific coast of North America several thousand kilometers north of the Baja peninsula.
Our argument is whether or not the turtles near the Baja peninsula and the turtles near Japan belong to the same group; the fact that there are other nesting sites is irrelevant to the argument.
B
The distance between nesting sites and feeding sites of Atlantic loggerhead turtles is less than 5,000 kilometers.
This provides more information about conditions exclusively in the Atlantic Ocean, while our argument discusses Pacific turtles. This information does not impact our argument about the Pacific turtles.
C
Loggerhead hatchlings in Japanese waters have been declining in number for the last decade while the number of nesting sites near the Baja peninsula has remained constant.
This answer does not weaken the argument because it gives information about the number of hatchlings (aka individual turtles) near Japan, but the number of nesting sites near the Baja peninsula. Comparing these different data points is not useful and doesn’t weaken the argument.
D
Ninety-five percent of the DNA samples taken from the Baja turtles match those taken from Atlantic loggerhead turtles.
This tells us that two sets of turtles that are definitely from different groups (Atlantic turtles and Pacific turtles) have a 95% DNA match. If turtles from different groups can have 95% DNA match, then the argument loses its support.
E
Commercial aquariums have been successfully breeding Atlantic loggerheads with Pacific loggerheads for the last five years.
The argument is about turtles in the wild, and whether or not turtles found in two different areas belong to the same group. (E) does not provide any information that impacts this argument.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 114 Explanations
Section 1 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
Section 2 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Section 3 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.