Yeah I'd start from game one. I wouldn't say that they "build" from one another necessarily, I just think it makes the most sense to start at one for a few reasons. 1) You don't want to start on games that you're going to want to PT with. 2) There are a lot of "weird" games in the earlier sets that are good to have exposure to. 3) It's way easier to keep track of foolproofing (to me at least) going in order
Thank you 10000019 and MissChanandler for your replies. I should've been more specific: If I hope to work through every logic game from PT 1-84 (or as many of them as I can) before test day, do you recommend starting with PT 1 and working forward through 84, or should numerical order play no role? (I'm wondering if LGs build from each other in any sense.)
It sounds like OP means going through the PTs' logic games in order (like 1-35 for foolproofing). I think either way I would say yes- foolproofing in order is great. I usually do the games in a PT in order as well. I think the only time you shouldn't do that is if you get a crazy game and you just don't know where to start or if you are only aiming to do three games- in that case, you might not want to just automatically do the first three.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Sorry, you need a subscription for that.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
5 comments
Thanks for your thoughts!
Yeah I'd start from game one. I wouldn't say that they "build" from one another necessarily, I just think it makes the most sense to start at one for a few reasons. 1) You don't want to start on games that you're going to want to PT with. 2) There are a lot of "weird" games in the earlier sets that are good to have exposure to. 3) It's way easier to keep track of foolproofing (to me at least) going in order
Thank you 10000019 and MissChanandler for your replies. I should've been more specific: If I hope to work through every logic game from PT 1-84 (or as many of them as I can) before test day, do you recommend starting with PT 1 and working forward through 84, or should numerical order play no role? (I'm wondering if LGs build from each other in any sense.)
It sounds like OP means going through the PTs' logic games in order (like 1-35 for foolproofing). I think either way I would say yes- foolproofing in order is great. I usually do the games in a PT in order as well. I think the only time you shouldn't do that is if you get a crazy game and you just don't know where to start or if you are only aiming to do three games- in that case, you might not want to just automatically do the first three.
Not sure whether you are asking:
Whether to do the games inside one PT sequentially.
Whether to do entire LG sections sequentially.