I didn't do much with those tests after the CC. I just started doing PTs w/ review. After a handful of PTs, I would evaluate my weak areas and then review and drill those weak areas. I used 42-51 to drill weak areas. PT52-61 for timed sections. And PT62 and onward for PTs/more timed sections.
I think the older tests are great for learning the fundamentals but I feel the newest tests differ enough that your time is probably best spent using newer tests.
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
2 comments
It's great to foolproof the games from 1-35
I didn't do much with those tests after the CC. I just started doing PTs w/ review. After a handful of PTs, I would evaluate my weak areas and then review and drill those weak areas. I used 42-51 to drill weak areas. PT52-61 for timed sections. And PT62 and onward for PTs/more timed sections.
I think the older tests are great for learning the fundamentals but I feel the newest tests differ enough that your time is probably best spent using newer tests.