3 comments

  • Friday, May 31 2019

    Our premise says if Justifiably Regretted, then should not be Desired.

    Our conclusion says Many (some) Forgone Pleasures should not be Desired.

    So we need something that says Many (some) Forgone Pleasures are Justifiably Regretted.

    In lawgic:

    Premise: JR -> D

    Conclusion: FP (-some -) D (many can be mapped as a some relationship)

    Gap: FP (- some -) JR (A some B, B -> C, A some C cookie cutter SA form)

    D is exactly that.

    C translates into D and R (not JR) -> FP which doesn't match what we need.

    1
  • Friday, May 31 2019

    @drbrown2259 thanks, I corrected the it!

    0
  • Thursday, May 30 2019

    Can you double check the question cite? 3.2.10 is a MBT question

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?