Subscription pricing
Given the rule, "If G and S are both in, then W is in," I understand the contrapositive is "If W is out, then G is out or S is out (since both G and S cannot be in). But why doesn't the contrapositive also allow for the possibility that G and S are BOTH out (as well as W being out)?
0
2 comments
this might help solidify your understanding of the word "or" on the lsat!
https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/why-is-or-so-confusing/
"Remember the rule of thumb is to read them like in sentence (1), the inclusive usage of the word."
It does allow for that possibility. It's just the difference between "inclusive or" vs "exclusive or".