I was wondering what the main differences between most strongly supported questions and Weakening questions such as how to approach them?
Normal:
Strongly Supported:
The Stimulus does not have an argument, but rather premisesYou have to find the conclusion of the argument in the answer choicesWeakening:
The Stimulus has an Argument (Premises/Conclusion)You have to find the answer that weakens the support between the premises and conclusion in the answer choicesCausation and Phenomenon-Hypothesis:
Strongly Supported:
The Stimulus has a phenomenon and hypothesisYou have to find the answer that blocks out alternative hypothesisWeakening:
The Stimulus has a phenomenon and hypothesisYou have to find the answer that is competing or corroborating with the hypothesisPlease let me know if this is wrong and how I can improve my understanding.
Thanks.
0 comments