I was wondering what the main differences between most strongly supported questions and Weakening questions such as how to approach them?

Normal:

Strongly Supported:

  • The Stimulus does not have an argument, but rather premises
  • You have to find the conclusion of the argument in the answer choices
  • Weakening:

  • The Stimulus has an Argument (Premises/Conclusion)
  • You have to find the answer that weakens the support between the premises and conclusion in the answer choices
  • Causation and Phenomenon-Hypothesis:

    Strongly Supported:

  • The Stimulus has a phenomenon and hypothesis
  • You have to find the answer that blocks out alternative hypothesis
  • Weakening:

  • The Stimulus has a phenomenon and hypothesis
  • You have to find the answer that is competing or corroborating with the hypothesis
  • Please let me know if this is wrong and how I can improve my understanding.

    Thanks.

    0

    0 comments

    Confirm action

    Are you sure?