Subscription pricing
Hi,
Does anyone have any study tips for understanding converse/inverse statements that appear on LR questions to trick the test taker?
For example, on Necessary or Sufficient Assumption questions, I have a difficult time differentiating the converse/inverse from the contrapositive, and because of the time constraint, I consistently get these answers wrong.
0
1 comments
I would just make some flashcards:
contrapositive
(front)
A -> B
/B -> /A
(back)
VALID
converse
(front)
A-> B
B -> A
(back)
INVALID
inverse
(front)
A -> B
/A -> /B
(back)
INVALID
And just drill them until it becomes 2nd nature. Does that make sense? Hope this helps!