1 comments

  • Friday, Apr 15 2022

    Why is it not D because if the expert consultant found that it did not save much, then the consultant is taking some of the risk

    Mr. Blatt: Expert consultants are sought after by

    management because they help

    executives make better decisions. That is

    why they are worth the substantial fees

    they charge.

    Ms. Fring: Nonsense. Expert consultants are hired

    in order to enable executives to avoid

    responsibility. The more the experts cost,

    the more they can be blamed when things

    go wrong.

    Which one of the following, if it occurred, would be

    the strongest evidence favoring Ms. Fring's position

    over Mr. Blatt's position?

    (A)

    (B)

    (C)

    (E)

    A. A company that is trying to decide whether to

    move its manufacturing plant hires an

    expensive expert to conduct a cost/benefit

    analysis.

    B. Two competing companies faced with very

    similar problems adopt different solutions, one

    with the help of a consultant, one without.

    C. A successful firm of expert consultants seeks to

    increase its volume of business by reducing its

    fees, but its volume of business drops.

    D. An expert consultant builds up a successful

    business by charging clients a substantial

    percentage of the amount an independent

    assessor judges that the consultant saved the

    company

    E. A company follows a consultant's advice to

    open two new stores, but both stores are only

    marginally profitable at first.

    0

Confirm action

Are you sure?