Subscription pricing
Can you help me break down this question? My understanding of the argument is: the two sub-conclusions are inconsistent with each other (outside principles vs constitution only), therefore the first sentence is not true. I selected answer choice E because it seemed like the most reasonable option, but I don't understand the structure of the argument and what does the "particular premise" in answer choice E refers to? Thank you!
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question"
0
1 comments
I think this is an argument that leads to a contradiction. Mapped out it looks like this:
Role: Protect HR
~Constitution Explicit --> SC Outside Constitution
~ HR Subject --> SC Inside Constitution
Must use Constitution
False(Role: Protect HR)
In letter terms:
A
A-->B
C-->~B
C
A is false
E) basically states we could as easily conclude C is false instead of A which is easy to see when you substitute in the letters.
Hope this helps!