Subscription pricing
After mastering and fool proofing the LG curriculum should I do the same for PT 1-20 or 1-35? I have heard both approaches are good to get to -1/-0.
0
After mastering and fool proofing the LG curriculum should I do the same for PT 1-20 or 1-35? I have heard both approaches are good to get to -1/-0.
1 comments
I think it largely depends on how quickly you feel you're grasping LG. For some people, they may have LG totally nailed down after doing the games from PTs 1-10. It's totally possible! Others may need 1-20 or 1-35. You may even need 1-35 plus most modern tests or all tests in existence. LG just comes more naturally to some. Personally, after completing 1-35, I felt far more confident with LG, but I still wasn't guaranteed a -1/-0 on each new section I attempted. Sure, I've been getting a fair amount of -1s and -0s, but I'm still working to iron out discrepancies. All of this is to say: Just start going through 1-35 and see how you feel. If you get through just the first 10 or 15 PTs and feel like you're crushing it, that's great! You may just be a natural. If you feel like you need 1-35, that's also totally fine. And if you get through 1-35 and still don't feel you have it mastered, that's fine as well! Everybody learns at different paces. All that matters is that you get to where you need to go.