Steele claims to have found evidence for Lamarckian hereditary mechanism in the immune system. Not sure what this means but presumably the rest of the passage will flesh this out.
How does our immune system work? If knowledge of how to defend against attacks are coded in the genes, how does it defend against a new disease, something it's never encountered before?
Partial Explanation ·Some immune system cells mutate a lot
The immune system doesn't know. But "typo" mutations (when an error occurs when transcribing DNA into RNA) happen a lot which allows immune system to test different defenses.
Steele hypothesizes that the "typo" mutations that end up working gets coded back into the immune cell's DNA. Steele further hypothesizes that a virus then carries the altered immune cell DNA into the DNA of the reproductive cells. That's the mechanism by which an environmentally induced adaptation (in the immune cell) gets inherited.
The author’s attitude is revealed in theselines. By calling the hypothesis “speculative” and noting that other biologists are “not so easily swayed,” the author conveys that she doesn’t necessarily agree with it and doesn’t believe the evidence in favor of it is particularly strong.
a
confidence in its █████
Anti-supported. The author doesn’t necessarily agree with Steele’s hypothesis.
b
indignation at its ██████████ ████ █████████
There’s no evidence the author is critical because it’s different from Darwinism. The author doesn’t comment in a negative way on the fact that Steele’s hypothesis doesn’t align with Darwinism.
c
distrust of its ███████
There’s no evidence that author is distrustful because of the hypothesis’s novelty. There’s no indication the author thinks a new hypothesis is inherently suspicious. What the author cares about is the speculative nature of the hypothesis and its lack of convincing supporting evidence.
d
doubt concerning its ████████████
This best captures the author’s attitude as conveyed by theselines.
e
dismay at its ████ ██ █████
“Dismay” is too negative. The author doesn’t express distress or concern about a lack of rigor. Although the author does call the hypothesis “speculative,” she doesn’t suggest that she’s unhappy or disappointed because of its speculative nature.
Difficulty
91% of people who answer get this correct
This is a low-difficulty question.
It is significantly easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%120
128
75%144
Analysis
Author’s attitude
Implied
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
3%
157
b
1%
154
c
3%
162
d
91%
163
e
2%
162
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.