PT145.S1.P4.Q22 > Analytics

Hide analysis

The French biologist Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck (1744–1829) outlined a theory of evolutionary change in 1809, 50 years before Darwin's . ██ ███ ██████ ██ ████████ █████████ █████ ████ ███ ████ █████████ ██████ ██ ████████ ██ █████ ███████████ ███ ████ ████ ██ ██ █████ █████████ ███ ███ ███████████████ ████ ████ █████████ ███

Lamarck's Theory of Evolution · Environmental adaptations could be inherited

Critique · Consensus view among scientists is that Lamarck is wrong

Steele · Claims to have evidence for Lamarckism

Steele claims to have found evidence for Lamarckian hereditary mechanism in the immune system. Not sure what this means but presumably the rest of the passage will flesh this out.

Phenomenon · Complexity of the immune system

How does our immune system work? If knowledge of how to defend against attacks are coded in the genes, how does it defend against a new disease, something it's never encountered before?

Partial Explanation · Some immune system cells mutate a lot

The immune system doesn't know. But "typo" mutations (when an error occurs when transcribing DNA into RNA) happen a lot which allows immune system to test different defenses.

██████ ████████████ ████ ███ ███████ ███ ████ ███████ ████ ████ ████ ███████ ████ ████████ ██████████████ ██ ███ ████ ████ ███ ███ ████ ████████ ██████████ ██ █████ █████████ ███ ███ ███████████ ████████ ███ ███████████ ██ █████ █████ ████ ███ ███ ████ ██ ███████ ██ ███ ████████████ █████ ███ ███ █████ ███ ███ ███████ ███████ ███ ████████ ███ ██████ ███ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██████████ ██████████ ██████ ███ ███████ ███████ ████ ██ █████████ ███ ████ ████ ███████ ██ ████████ ███ ████████████ █████ ██ ████████ ███ ██ █████ ██████ █████ █████ ██████████ ███████████ ████ ███████ █ █████ █████ █████ ███ ███████ ███ ██ ███ ████████████ █████ ███ ███████ ███ ███ ██ █████ ██████

Steele's Hypothesis · Supporting Lamarckism

Steele hypothesizes that the "typo" mutations that end up working gets coded back into the immune cell's DNA. Steele further hypothesizes that a virus then carries the altered immune cell DNA into the DNA of the reproductive cells. That's the mechanism by which an environmentally induced adaptation (in the immune cell) gets inherited.

███ ████ ██ ███ ███████ ██████ ███ ███ ██████████ ████████ ██ █████████ ████ ██ ████ ████████ ██████ ███

Evidence · for Steele's Hypothesis?

████████████ ██████████ ███ █████ ████████ █████████ ██ ██ ████ ████ ██ ████ ██████████████ █████████ ██████ ███ ███ ██████████ █████ ██ ████ █████ ████ █████████ ██████ █ ███████████ ██ ████ ██████ ████ ██ ████████ ███ █████ ███ █████ ████ █████ ████████████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██████████ ████ █████ ████ █ ████████ ███████ ██ █████████ ████████████ ██ ██████████ █████ ██ █████ █████ █████████ █████████ █████ ██ ███ █████ ███████████ ███ ████ ███████████ ████ ███ ██ ███ ████████████ ███████ ███

Steele · Yes, circumstantial evidence

Steele claims that there's circumstantial evidence. Something about a pattern of mutations. Not sure what this means.

█████ ██████████ ███ ███ ██ ██████ ███████ ████ ███████ █████ ███ ██ ██████ ████ ███████ ████████████ ███ ███ ███████ ██ █████████ ████ ██████ ██████

Other Biologists · No, there are simpler explanations for the "pattern of mutations"

Passage Style

Critique or debate

Phenomenon-hypothesis (RC)

22.

The passage most strongly suggests ████ ███ ██████ ███ █████ ███ ██ ███ █████████ █████████ ██████ ███ ██████ ████████ ██ ██████ ███ ███ ███████████

Question Type

Author’s attitude

Implied

The author’s attitude is revealed in these lines. By calling the hypothesis “speculative” and noting that other biologists are “not so easily swayed,” the author conveys that she doesn’t necessarily agree with it and doesn’t believe the evidence in favor of it is particularly strong.

confidence in its █████

Anti-supported. The author doesn’t necessarily agree with Steele’s hypothesis.

indignation at its ██████████ ████ █████████

There’s no evidence the author is critical because it’s different from Darwinism. The author doesn’t comment in a negative way on the fact that Steele’s hypothesis doesn’t align with Darwinism.

distrust of its ███████

There’s no evidence that author is distrustful because of the hypothesis’s novelty. There’s no indication the author thinks a new hypothesis is inherently suspicious. What the author cares about is the speculative nature of the hypothesis and its lack of convincing supporting evidence.

doubt concerning its ████████████

This best captures the author’s attitude as conveyed by these lines.

91%

dismay at its ████ ██ █████

“Dismay” is too negative. The author doesn’t express distress or concern about a lack of rigor. Although the author does call the hypothesis “speculative,” she doesn’t suggest that she’s unhappy or disappointed because of its speculative nature.

PrepTest 145 - Section 1 - Passage 4 - Question 22

Difficulty

Analysis

Answer Popularity

Question history

Answer five questions and we'll estimate your score.

Confirm action