Steele claims to have found evidence for Lamarckian hereditary mechanism in the immune system. Not sure what this means but presumably the rest of the passage will flesh this out.
How does our immune system work? If knowledge of how to defend against attacks are coded in the genes, how does it defend against a new disease, something it's never encountered before?
Partial Explanation ·Some immune system cells mutate a lot
The immune system doesn't know. But "typo" mutations (when an error occurs when transcribing DNA into RNA) happen a lot which allows immune system to test different defenses.
Steele hypothesizes that the "typo" mutations that end up working gets coded back into the immune cell's DNA. Steele further hypothesizes that a virus then carries the altered immune cell DNA into the DNA of the reproductive cells. That's the mechanism by which an environmentally induced adaptation (in the immune cell) gets inherited.
Other Biologists ·No, there are simpler explanations for the "pattern of mutations"
Passage Style
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis
23.
The passage is primarily concerned ████
Question Type
Implied
Purpose of passage
The author is primarily focused on presenting Steele’s hypothesis concerning a mechanisms that could support Lamarck’s theory of evolutionary change. The author gives context for understanding Steele’s hypothesis in P2, describes the hypothesis in P3, and desribes Steele’s alleged evidence in P4.
This isn’t the primary purpose of the passage, because Lamarck’s evolutionary theory is brought up only in the first half of P1, and we don’t get information about how the theory was developed.
This best captures the primary purpose. The long-disregarded theory is Lamarck’s theory of evolutionary change. The author focuses on Steele’s efforts to show that Lamarck’s theory can actually be correct.
c
answering a set ██ █████████ █████ ███ ██████ ██████ ██ █████ ██ ████████████ ██████
This is too narrow. Although the author does discuss the immune system in P2, this discussion is part of the context for understanding Steele’s hypothesis. The overall purpose of the passage isn’t about the immune system.
The author doesn’t “evaluate” the “merits” of an evolutionary theory. She doesn’t assess the quality or usefulness of Lamarck’s theory. If you think (D) is referring to Steele’s hypothesis, it’s still wrong, because we don’t know that “most” (over half) biologists have rejected the hypothesis.
This doesn’t capture the author’s focus on presenting Steele’s hypothesis. The author does use Lamarck’s theory as a case study. She doesn’t examine Lamarck’s theory for the purpose of drawing lessons from it.
Difficulty
80% of people who answer get this correct
This is a moderately difficult question.
It is somewhat easier than other questions in this passage.
CURVE
Score of students with a 50% chance of getting this right
25%134
146
75%158
Analysis
Implied
Purpose of passage
Critique or debate
Phenomenon-hypothesis
Science
Answer Popularity
PopularityAvg. score
a
1%
150
b
80%
164
c
3%
158
d
15%
159
e
1%
151
Question history
You don't have any history with this question.. yet!
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.