For weaken, my approach is that whatever answer choice I choose is one that the author cannot make a counterargument against. In other words, they would be defenseless. If they can argue with you about your choice, then you have chosen the wrong weakening point.
For strengthening, it is a matter of choosing an answer choice that would make the stimulus make sense and essentially make it complete.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
1 comments
For weaken, my approach is that whatever answer choice I choose is one that the author cannot make a counterargument against. In other words, they would be defenseless. If they can argue with you about your choice, then you have chosen the wrong weakening point.
For strengthening, it is a matter of choosing an answer choice that would make the stimulus make sense and essentially make it complete.