Hi, so I am in a panic because I have my LOR and CAS report but not my transcripts on file. I have ordered them but not received and I am trying to apply by Dec 31. Can I submit my application and pay to send the CAS and it will update when they recieve it? or do I need to fully wait?
im like dory from finding nemo... this is gonna be great!!
@sjbutton so the powerscore bibles say this and its been helpful with these questions:
any new element in the conclusion will appear in the correct answer.
elements that are common to the conclusion and at least one or two premises normally do not appear in the correct answer.
elements that appear in the premises but not the conclusion usually appear in the correct answer.
does anyone have a list on all the question stems for LR?
what exactly does:
Patterns in right answers P → C
mean?
is it bad to take a break from studying LR and coming to RC??
Any advice for weakening and strengthening questions? I am just plain stuck!!
Does anyone have any tips for lawgic? I feel it is taking so much more time for me to do that first then answer the questions..
Thanks in advance!
So what has helped everyone determine if something is an argument or not an argument in LR questions?
Hi!! I am looking to start a study group in Auburn, AL I am taking the test in January 2026. Please reach out if interested in studying together.
@NaomiGonzalez What is the book?
from the review here can someone tell me if what i have bolded is correct?
If a conjunction occurs within the sufficient condition, both elements together guarantee the necessary condition. Neither alone is independently sufficient. In Lawgic, keep "and" within the sufficient condition. the two need each other to be necessary.
If a conjunction occurs within the necessary condition, two events are independently necessary when the sufficient condition is triggered. In Lawgic, these can be represented as separate conditionals leading from the sufficient condition. the two can both happen independent of another upon the sufficent.
so does this mean in these basically the subject is the sufficient and the predicate is the necessary?? im lost
Does anyone have an easy way to break this down to make this make sense? I take the LSAT in january so i need help with fast easy and quick tips
@KayceBassman i also thought this, after reading the comments people said "the only" should go in group 1 but idk
is there a formula for these? im lost
Hi! I am just now starting 7sage live and I am working through the foundations part of my study plan. Does anyone have any recommendations and how to go about which live classes to watch? I feel like there is so much I have no clue where to even start.
So far I am having troubles with assumptions in arguments, it is still just in the beginning but I didn't know if there are any sessions on that?
so assumptions are not written in arguments on the LSAT, we just have to make sure not to make them? I am confused.
Will the assumptions always be there worded for you? and you have to depict what premise is the assumption? or is it not written and its what you assume?
@Hanna Wallace thats what im worried but i am also waiting on my LSAT score so they wont even review until they have that either so I just dont know!