Self-study
Hi guys!
I am assuming Link Assumption is diagramming stuff which is my weakest point. Which Fast Track and lessons should I go over again so it clicks? Thanks
3
Hi guys!
I am assuming Link Assumption is diagramming stuff which is my weakest point. Which Fast Track and lessons should I go over again so it clicks? Thanks
5 comments
https://7sage.com/lessons/logical-reasoning/lr-fast-track/fast-track-must-be-true-questions
https://7sage.com/lessons/logical-reasoning/lr-fast-track/fast-track-sufficient-assumption
Link assumption doesn't usually involve diagramming.
@J.Y.Ping holy its the goat himself. Thanks for the reply i'm gonna check those videos out in a moment, just a real quick question. Everytime I see a conditional I panic and want to avoid it, but it seems that it's unavoidable at this point. Is there any specific parts in the core curriculum that would would help and solidify what I need to know and actually work in my next preptest I do when I encounter these questions? I just see conditionals and diagramming and always get lost unfortunately. Actual LSAT is coming soon, stress is up lol Thanks a lot for what you do again, helps us all out A LOT.
In the same boat rn with a 50% accuracy 💀 I think the LinkA refers to the stimulus type but the lessons refers to the question stem. I've seen a lot of SA/NA but also the classic WSE/Flaw Qs. I think in general, lawgic helps a lot with LinkA.
@chrisabulius my issue is that i can't wrap my head around long lawgic chains. like ok if goes on left then other one goes on the right then negate, nice but what if theres 3 conditionals i just keep linking them together then negate? like its hard i don't get it.
@Arthurxx If there's 3 conditionals, you can only link them if the Transitive Property applies. Like if A→B B→C, A→C. So if A→B is given to you, and the conclusion is somehow A→C, then it's kinda necessary for B→C to be established for the argument to be valid, if it makes sense.