so over this section that I didn't even have the energy to crash out.

AGAIN IM STUCK BETWEEN THE RIGHT AND WRONG ANSWER IN LAST 2!!!! I NEGATE BOTH AND THEY BOTH WOULD MAKE THE ARGUMENT NOT WORK D AND A. THIS IS PISSING ME OFF NOW. EVERY SINGLE TRY NOW IN THIS SECTION I'VE BEEN LIKE THIS . I HATE NA. FAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

how am i suppose to know the assumption would be the cost of purchasing when the passage didn't even talk about that man come on.

does anyone have actual tips on NA because I keep narrowing it down to the last 2 and choosing the wrong one instead of the right one. I am genuinely over this section.

Finally, even though this was a 2/5 difficulty, I thank the Lord Jesus Christ for ONE DUB AFTER A WHOLE consecutive LOSS THIS WHOLE SECTION BRUH.

NA questions is the only question besides conditional mapping stuff i get constantly wrong. SOMEONE HELPPPPPPP

I still don't understand the difference between D and E for some reason.

Is there another way instead of mapping and contrapostivies? Its so hard and time consuming I don't know even if I can use it on test day.

I was stuck between C and D, I thought D could have proven the conclusion as it stating the opposite of what the Premises are saying. So therefore it would prove, I don’t know that was my thought process.

I got this correct quickly somehow. I went through this question through the lense of a spectrum like a strengthen question, in the sense of which one gaps the best! A gapped the best bridge, while the others were great, it wasn't a solid best.

I got it right in blind review. I think I realized that B was jumping the gun and saying immediately that they wished to hurt the company. But it did not list the facts first to prove that, A did that. So, B was not the best bridge to connect to the conclusion. And D is just an alternative hypothesis so that modifier should have been the signal to throw it out. Tough question.

idk why I mistakenly thought "latter use" was reffering to the Brazilian Government. Sigh.

to understand these a arrow b things which lesson do i go back to? is it formal logic? i struggle with NA and these chain things.. sigh #help

I was between A and C and chose C from POE. I only took A out because I thought the term "Sample" referred to like a survey or something; not a personal thing like the author's friends. Well lesson learned sample can also include that lol

#help

Can someone dumb it down for why it's A?? Because the scientist was talking about the M group getting cured, and the reporter also says that anyone in the study had athlete's foot that was not cured, that person did not receive medication M. So, I am confused on how his statement was wrong? He speicifed what the scientist said and specified it about that exact experimental groups done in the study. Also if someone can dumb down "confusing necessity with sufficient" that would be great, because I feel like maybe I am understanding the concept wrong :')

What's everyone strategy on these? I can't seem to get these and NA questions so far.

We are so back after that ridiculously hard NA section.