Hello everyone,

I'm just wondering if I should complete the "foundations" curriculum and the logical reasoning + reading comprehension tabs in the learning section before practicing and running drills. I've been analyzing some LR questions and explanations during winter/summer breaks for the past 1-2 years just to see what I'm getting into, but I have never taken a PT before. I assumed it would be best to start fully exposing myself to the kind of underlying logic that is on the test. However, I don't want to spend too much time on foundations and miss out on valuable trial/error and targeting my weak spots. I am taking the test in June so I have a good amount of time. Thanks!

2

5 comments

  • From someone who studied before doing curriculum, I skimmed thru foundations. The curriculum gets convoluted at times, and made me overthink my answers. But still helpful nonetheless. My advice would be to know your weaknesses and focus on them in the curriculum rather than cramming all the info

    1
  • 6 days ago

    Hey, I recommend the foundations and curriculum. It is really helpful with breaking the test down. You can skip lessons if you want but I would start there.

    1
  • Tuesday, Jan 06

    Hi there,

    I'm also on a very similar timeline, only difference is that I'm brand new to the LSAT. I will say that the foundations seems super simple but they have helped me tremendously, specially since I'm a non-native language speaker. I'm taking my time to really soak it all in, there is not rush since we have months. Good luck on your studying!

    2

Confirm action

Are you sure?