User Avatar
•

Thursday, Jan 22

đź’Ş Motivated

Conditional Reasoning

Hey Guys, Quick question if you can help. For conditional reasoning, is the opposite of "no", "ALL"? For example, "no person can work without A" would the opposite the be "all persons can work with A"?

1

8 comments

  • Thursday, Jan 22

    The opposite of "no" is just "some". This could be 1, 10 , "most", or "all". You have to be really careful with these negations and account for different outcomes.

    3
  • Thursday, Jan 22

    The opposite of a “no” statement isn’t usually “all.” For example, “No person can work without A” means everyone needs A to work. The opposite would be more like “At least one person can work without A”, because the opposite just has to contradict the original, not restate it.

    3
  • Thursday, Jan 22

    Have you gone through the CC for this? They clearly explain and outline it.

    -1

Confirm action

Are you sure?