Self-study
I had a friend tell me what you score on the blind review is a more accurate representation of what your LSAT score would be. Is that true? Wanted a second opinion.
2
I had a friend tell me what you score on the blind review is a more accurate representation of what your LSAT score would be. Is that true? Wanted a second opinion.
4 comments
Hottake here and going totally against the recommendations of 7sage. I found that BR was unhelpful for me and in fact would confuse me. I have found it much more effective to skip BR, see which ones I got wrong- and do a deep dive into where I went wrong. I felt so obligated to commit to BR because of how much everyone says it helps, but different things work for everyone.
I would say yes and no. Obviously, you have more time to properly read the passage and analyze, and ultimately, decide on the right answer. The caveat to that is that often people are stuck between two answer choices that look good; so, once they submit the question and get it incorrect, then they select the next "best" answer and it ends up being correct. In a way, this can skew your perception of your true ability because fundamentally there is still a lack of understanding. BR is best for reviewing and it works in tandem with your "Wrong-Answer Journal."
EDIT: TLDR: I wouldn't fully rely on BR score being reflective of what your LSAT score would be; instead, it is a tool you should use when reviewing questions.