hey everybody, i'm studying 2-3 hours/day to take the June LSAT and i've been scoring between 163-166 on recent PTs, trying to get into the 166-170 score band consistently. RC has proven to be the bane of my existence lol, I feel like I can pre-phrase an answer well but when looking at the actual answer choices the two that I get down to don't seem to as directly correlate to examples from the passage as LR and I usually end up picking the wrong one. Does anyone have tips for this/understand what I mean? Is there another way to look at it that makes it make sense? I'm regularly missing 5-7 on RC and I want to get that down to 3-4 to maximize my score.
1
1 comments
Do you have an example? For some question types vague is fine. For example, for purpose "explain a phenomenon" is fine, but not for main idea. If you have a specific question you had a problem with that would be easier to look at for context.