I still don't feel like simply reading Passage A can get rid of A, but Passage B doesn't really talk about A, so I would choose E but not until I read Passage B
I noticed I answered both sets of questions correctly initially, just using Passage A. Am I correct to assume that when it comes to those questions that ask about alignment or agreeance of both, what is right for one is right for the other?
I agree that E is the right answer, but D is tempting. Passage A that that historians should see their role as a neutral judge and makes a direct reference to the judiciary. Isn't that also a standard in another field?
Yes, but passage B doesn't say anything about adopting standards from another field. It does state news reporters but it says that it "bears no resemblance". The question is asking about something that advances both passages.
10 comments
I still don't feel like simply reading Passage A can get rid of A, but Passage B doesn't really talk about A, so I would choose E but not until I read Passage B
this is newton's apple for me
Split method is the cure to my comparative passage blues. I am SOLD!
Dude, this shit is broken. Didn't get one wrong
I noticed I answered both sets of questions correctly initially, just using Passage A. Am I correct to assume that when it comes to those questions that ask about alignment or agreeance of both, what is right for one is right for the other?
The split method is magic
Just learning this now and it is striking me as the way to go!
It really is.
I agree that E is the right answer, but D is tempting. Passage A that that historians should see their role as a neutral judge and makes a direct reference to the judiciary. Isn't that also a standard in another field?
Yes, but passage B doesn't say anything about adopting standards from another field. It does state news reporters but it says that it "bears no resemblance". The question is asking about something that advances both passages.