I noticed I answered both sets of questions correctly initially, just using Passage A. Am I correct to assume that when it comes to those questions that ask about alignment or agreeance of both, what is right for one is right for the other?
I agree that E is the right answer, but D is tempting. Passage A that that historians should see their role as a neutral judge and makes a direct reference to the judiciary. Isn't that also a standard in another field?
4
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
8 comments
Split method is the cure to my comparative passage blues. I am SOLD!
Dude, this shit is broken. Didn't get one wrong
I noticed I answered both sets of questions correctly initially, just using Passage A. Am I correct to assume that when it comes to those questions that ask about alignment or agreeance of both, what is right for one is right for the other?
The split method is magic
I agree that E is the right answer, but D is tempting. Passage A that that historians should see their role as a neutral judge and makes a direct reference to the judiciary. Isn't that also a standard in another field?