Passage B is really gameplaying. The facts are an objective reality. Interpretation and argumentation are something else. Only my narcistic ex thought reality could be argued away
#feedback It may be better to learn the sequential approach with a brand new passage following the split approach. OR for the next set of lessons, start with sequential then move onto split. With the way the curriculum for this topic is being presented, it's steering us to practice the spit approach with fresh eyes and makes that the best option moving forward. We never really give the sequential one a fair shot by just following along with this module. I suggest swapping the Sequential and Split approaches after this passage to start with sequential, then try the split to give both an even shot since they both use the same passages.
I find myself barely paying attention to this lesson because I've already digested the passage in the earlier lessons. This feels more like a blind review of questions already done than attempting a novel approach. Please swap the methods for the next passage set!
I think it would be really helpful to hear a passage reading in real-time. I'm having difficulties knowing how much I should be reviewing the passage as I'm reading it, and I average around 4.5 minutes to read a passage (even the easier ones), which is just way too long. I've noticed myself trying to analyze the passages the way Kevin does in videos as I'm reading, but that obviously wouldn't work on a real test under timed conditions.
Does 7Sage have any videos where they run through a passage not as a lesson but just as an example so we can see what the thought process is really like? I've heard on the older podcasts that there are videos of JY taking tests. Are these still available and would these be a good resource for that? #help
How long is this method supposed to take, in reference to, reading both paragraphs and fully comprehending everything? I can read it but to fully break everything down and understand what each three line sentence means takes longer for me. If I have to use this method how much time should In devote to reading both passages?
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
9 comments
Passage B is really gameplaying. The facts are an objective reality. Interpretation and argumentation are something else. Only my narcistic ex thought reality could be argued away
#feedback It may be better to learn the sequential approach with a brand new passage following the split approach. OR for the next set of lessons, start with sequential then move onto split. With the way the curriculum for this topic is being presented, it's steering us to practice the spit approach with fresh eyes and makes that the best option moving forward. We never really give the sequential one a fair shot by just following along with this module. I suggest swapping the Sequential and Split approaches after this passage to start with sequential, then try the split to give both an even shot since they both use the same passages.
I find myself barely paying attention to this lesson because I've already digested the passage in the earlier lessons. This feels more like a blind review of questions already done than attempting a novel approach. Please swap the methods for the next passage set!
I think it would be really helpful to hear a passage reading in real-time. I'm having difficulties knowing how much I should be reviewing the passage as I'm reading it, and I average around 4.5 minutes to read a passage (even the easier ones), which is just way too long. I've noticed myself trying to analyze the passages the way Kevin does in videos as I'm reading, but that obviously wouldn't work on a real test under timed conditions.
Does 7Sage have any videos where they run through a passage not as a lesson but just as an example so we can see what the thought process is really like? I've heard on the older podcasts that there are videos of JY taking tests. Are these still available and would these be a good resource for that? #help
How long is this method supposed to take, in reference to, reading both paragraphs and fully comprehending everything? I can read it but to fully break everything down and understand what each three line sentence means takes longer for me. If I have to use this method how much time should In devote to reading both passages?