Would someone be able to provide me with some of the nuances and strategies needed when tackling link assumption questions. I seem to uniquely struggle with them on my tests and cannot find specific resources for how to approach them. I figure some sort of my mindset is incorrect but I have yet to be able to figure out what. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

2

8 comments

  • Wednesday, Aug 27

    if premise than conclusion. Also the answer is sometimes so simple it doesn't seem right. So understanding argument types helps

    0
  • Monday, Aug 18

    I'd diagram things out! For conditionals, diagram as normal but know where you can split the arrow (for and/ors), and for causal reasoning, Cause: _A_ --> Effect: _B_ which might lead to another Cause: _B_ --> Effect: _C_... etc.

    0
  • Saturday, Aug 16

    I found that what helped the most is to do the SA section in the core and then go back to foundations and redo conditional and casual logic

    1
  • Friday, Jul 25

    ^^ same! I have been searching through the core curriculum again, but am looking for something that will help me start to break through on these questions

    1
  • Thursday, Jul 24

    I second this! I also struggle with these. I've been re-running questions I have gotten wrong, but I'm sure you have thought of that.

    1

Confirm action

Are you sure?