Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
3 comments
I've been noticing a lot of biconditionals in the rules of the logic games in the 50s PTs so far, and I believe the wording goes something like this:
Either A or B, and not both
indicates A(--)/B
same as A->/B and /A->B
If A then B otherwise not B.
indicates A(--)B and /A(--)/B
same as B(--)A and /B(--)/A
I hope I did that right.
Is there any other wording that would indicate biconditional?
Thank you JY for the LG videos they are SO helpful and much better diagrams than other books.
Thank you JY =))
http://classic.7sage.com/lesson/advanced-bi-conditionals/