Hello, as the discussion title states, I am wondering why there is such a big difference. I have been studying for about 5 weeks and finally took my first PT (the June 2007) and scored 146. After Blind Reviewing, I managed to score a 167. Can someone please help me explain why there's such a big difference and what I can do to actually score my Blind Review score in future PT's I take? Thanks!

0

1 comments

  • Tuesday, Aug 26 2014

    When you learn to adapt to the pressure of time, and begin to eliminate bad answer choices rather than select them, you will see your score increase dramatically. I took two "bad" PTs before I achieve a mid-160s score. But even scoring in the upper 160's, I don't think I'll ever achieve my B/R score in the upper 170s. Some of the "curve-breaker" questions take me 4-5 minutes and several attempts to figure out, I just don't have that time during the actual exam. That's where the discrepancy is: efficiency. Eventually, you will learn how to be more efficient, and your score will reflect that. Good luck! :-)

    1

Confirm action

Are you sure?