Subscription pricing
J.Y. can you please put up an explanation for this one?
admin edit 09-01-2016: http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-3-question-23/
0
J.Y. can you please put up an explanation for this one?
admin edit 09-01-2016: http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-3-question-23/
1 comments
@alexroark5906 the logical form of this flawed argument is:
if A --> B
not A
therefore Not B
it is a common invald argument form. I would revisit that section of JY's course.
make sure you know what "invariably" means, it indicates a sufficient condition. Also, for this question element B represents isolated socieities and NOT B represents socially unified socieities. Maybe that was part of the confusion?