User Avatar
16dnholli
Joined
Nov 2025
Subscription
Live

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 175
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027

Discussions

Lessons · You Try - Auto Mechanics
User Avatar
16dnholli
Yesterday

Shallow dip is helpful. I think the move for these is to flag them and come back at the end on the exam. And hope there isn't a lot of them lol

3
Lessons · Drill - Flaw Questions
User Avatar
16dnholli
2 days ago

This is why I should just never feel confident lol.

I was undefeated through the lessons...felt good about the drill...then go 1/5.

Though only having difficult questions felt mean and disrespectful lol

1
PrepTests ·
PT142.S4.Q18
User Avatar
16dnholli
2 days ago

I'm confused here, because in earlier lessons I thought it was mentioned that we assume "large study" is enough...

Or is it because they also had an age range and insomnia that makes it unrepresentative?

1
PrepTests ·
PT134.S3.Q14
User Avatar
16dnholli
2 days ago

I'm sorry...

am I the only one that didn't know what "repudiates" meant?!

Lol, is there an LSAT vocab book somewhere?

1
Lessons · Lesson 6 - Popularity of News Stories
User Avatar
16dnholli
2 days ago

@MarcosGuzman415 Sometimes I like to scroll to the bottom in the "Let's Review" section and the lesson takeaway that's pertinent and applicable to more than just the example is often written out!

1
Lessons · Lesson 6 - Popularity of News Stories
User Avatar
16dnholli
Edited 2 days ago

So, the takeaway I get here is that identifying the type of logic used can help eliminate answer choices?

I.e - a formal logic argument will only have a formal logic flaw

So, when we see this... the causal logic answer choices are always false?

1
Lessons · Review (AP)
User Avatar
16dnholli
3 days ago

For me, it helps to use the highlighting tools in the software and I just mark up the stim.

Pink = Premise

Orange = Concession point, counterargument, or context

Underline = Main and sub-conclusions

Then, I highlight the first word and last word of the excerpt being questioned in yellow.

That way, I have a good understanding of the role at a quick color-coded glance and can eliminate answers that are absolutely not possible. Then I read each ac with the use of the word that I ID it as. (i.e. I see it's a premise...then look at all ac's that use the word premise (or claim)).

1
Lessons · [OPTIONAL] Lesson 3 - Individual Freedom Requires Rule of Law
User Avatar
16dnholli
Friday, Jun 5

I'm confused on how you know which idea to make negate and make sufficient. Because the premises had "no" and "without" I actually worked in the contrapositive framework, because I thought that would be easier. But, I chose A.

Here is what I got on the map:

/Social Integrity --> /Freedom

/Social Integrity --> /Pursuit

------------------------------

/ROL --> /Freedom

So, do we just always work to not be in a contrapositive or what? Can we get more resources/practice on just mapping?

3
Lessons · You Try - Rational Consumer Behavior
User Avatar
16dnholli
Friday, Jun 5

WATCH the recorded lecture on SA by CLAYTON ALLEN!

HELPS A TON!!!

2
PrepTests ·
PT122.S2.Q3
User Avatar
16dnholli
Thursday, Jun 4

I chose B here because when I read "routine correspondence that could be delayed," I thought it was saying that the communication (i.e. information) being received would be delayed and therefore potentially significant.

I see how there's a lot of assuming in that thinking though...

I got it right in BR.

2
Lessons · You Try - Increasing Highway Speed Limits (PSAr)
User Avatar
16dnholli
Edited Wednesday, Jun 3

@Disney I like to re-open the question and toggle the option to "show analysis" of the stim. Then, I see if that's enough to help me understand why I missed something or confirm that I at least interpret the stim correctly. Then, I click on the lightbulbs to see the explanation for the answer choices that I chose or were stuck on. This also helps me confirm that I eliminated certain answers for the right reasons!

If that is not enough, I like to watch when I get it wrong or don't understand. But once I confirm I eliminated some answers correctly and for the right reasons, I only watch the explanation of the stim and the answer I chose + the correct answer.

Sometimes I skim the typed out explanation to see if anything is bolded (i.e. important) to takeaway.

1
LSAT · New Lawhub interface (aug 2026)
User Avatar
16dnholli
Wednesday, Jun 3

Hi, apparently a lot of concerns around these issues were heard by LSAC and they are fixing the bugs and re-releasing the format this month. Here is their latest video on what they're fixing:

https://www.lawhub.org/prepare-for-the-lsat/about-the-lsat/upcoming-changes-lsat-process-aug-2026

Hope this helps!

1
LSAT · New LSAT Interface -- No More Highlights in RC?
User Avatar
16dnholli
Wednesday, Jun 3

LSAC recently released this video as well. It looks like they're fixing a few reported issues:

https://www.lawhub.org/prepare-for-the-lsat/about-the-lsat/upcoming-changes-lsat-process-aug-2026

1
Lessons · You Try - Serious Financial Problems
User Avatar
16dnholli
Wednesday, Jun 3

@kitannasimp Thank you!

1
Lessons · You Try - Sentencing Guidelines (S)
User Avatar
16dnholli
Wednesday, Jun 3

Here, I talked myself out of the wrong answer because of some of the other lessons. I thought A only addressed a subset of the problem in that it only looks at harm-to-crime ratios BUT NOT linking the two crimes mentioned in the stimulus. I think I thought the ideal answer would say something along the lines of A AND mention or affirm that theft and bribery were similar.

So, I then chose D. Because I thought it at least connected the two crimes in some way that allows you to eliminate the "puzzling feeling" like we do in RRE. Or support that the evident consideration was in fact valid?!

But as I type this out...I think I get why it was wrong and see the error of my reasoning.

But I'm nervous that I'll mix up tasks and approaches to the correct answer like this again (sigh).

1
Lessons · Drill - WSE Questions
User Avatar
16dnholli
Tuesday, Jun 2

2/5 originally and then 5/5 on BR. The three I missed because I talked myself out of the other answer I chose. I got each down to the last 2 and each time I had the right answer within the 2. But I think I lose track of my task in drills like this where I know I'm doing WSE only. Then, I assume the task instead of approaching each one as if I didn't know what's coming next.

1
Lessons · You Try - Alzheimer's and Microglia (S)
User Avatar
16dnholli
Tuesday, Jun 2

Struggling with the concept of diagramming causal chains. Especially under time. I feel like this would just be a questions worthy of skipping...

5
LSAT · Question Stem Cheat Sheet?
User Avatar
16dnholli
Tuesday, Jun 2

@RobertCarlson Thank you, thank you!

2
LSAT · Question Stem Cheat Sheet?
User Avatar
16dnholli
Monday, Jun 1

@boomboom Thank you so much!

2
User Avatar
•

Friday, May 29

16dnholli

Question Stem Cheat Sheet?

Hi!

I'm wondering if there is a cheat sheet that exists to help coin what language indicates a specific task.

For example: "properly inferred" = Must Be True

I understand that for a lot of question stems there's more obvious wording (i.e. Which ... must be true = must be true) but I'm just curious if something like this exists and can be shared for the examples that aren't so readily apparent.

I have a cheat sheet with each question type and their approaches and would LOVE to be able to add this info to each.

Thank you!

1
PrepTests ·
PT108.S3.Q10
User Avatar
16dnholli
Thursday, May 28

I chose B, but not because of the claim discussing 17%

I thought B attacked the notion of "significant percentage of the population" portion of the final sentence.

"This shows that a significant percentage of the population would rather disrupt their travel plans than risk flying on a supposedly unlucky day."

So, if less than 5% of the population reports to believe in that day...then the people are not disrupting plans because of it being an unlucky day.

I understand that providing an alt reason would be ideal. And I hung on to option C in my head...but the "several major airports" to me seemed not inclusive enough of ALL airports i.e. ALL FLYERS. I understand that "several major airports" implies higher numbers of flyers. But I just thought that required a little too much extrapolation so I went with the more vague answer and talked myself out of it.

1
Lessons · The Importance of Blind Review
User Avatar
16dnholli
Wednesday, May 27

@jaidaanderson Thank you!

1
Lessons · Skill Builder - Chaining Conditionals 2
User Avatar
16dnholli
Tuesday, May 26

Can we get more of these?

4
Lessons · FAQ - Lawgic
User Avatar
16dnholli
Tuesday, May 26

Is there a specific place on here that we can just practice diagramming? Or a class?

It would be super helpful to integrate a diagramming practice section/drill.

1
Lessons · You Try - Serious Financial Problems
User Avatar
16dnholli
Tuesday, May 26

Is there somewhere on 7sage where we can JUST practice diagramming?

This question got me because I flagged "cannot" as an indicator for Group 4, so I negated "cannot be happy" to "be happy" and made it the necessary condition but that stumped me because then I had:

Serious Financial Problems --> / (cannot be happy)

Serious financial problems --> be happy

Which is completely wrong. I only flagged it here though because it just didn't make sense, but in a stim that doesn't intuitively make sense...I'd be more screwed.

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?