Discussions

User Avatar
18lwood130
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT101.S1.P3.Q17
User Avatar
18lwood130
Wednesday, Apr 26 2023

why isn't 17 b? i don't understand how traditional research is not the opponent #help

0
PrepTests ·
PT106.S3.Q25
User Avatar
18lwood130
Tuesday, Jul 26 2022

i'm confused on the last answer... if disease y is cancer, and disease x is lung cancer, then couldn't you say that smoking causes lung cancer but that smoking does not cause (all) cancer? #help

2
PrepTests ·
PT103.S2.Q12
User Avatar
18lwood130
Tuesday, Jul 26 2022

I thought the word "risk" was meant to be ambiguous so I chose c...

0

hi, i am taking my lsat in june, and recently my game scores have plummeted for some reason, so i am trying to get my scores back up –– when i was doing ok on them, it was right after i did the games part of 7sage, and i guess i was doing like 2 at a time over and over again, but i am wondering if anyone who has super improved on the games noticed which strategy is better (doing the same game a thousand times in a row or like alternating 3 sections over and over again)?

0
General · LSAT location.
User Avatar
18lwood130
Saturday, May 20 2023

does anyone have any tips about where to take it? like at home, at the library, etc? because with practice tests I have had issues both at home and at the library with, like, focus, so i don't think i personally have noticed that i have a preference, but maybe other people have, so i am curious about your thoughts/opinions?

0
PrepTests ·
PT120.S4.Q25
User Avatar
18lwood130
Friday, Nov 11 2022

1. how can the "performance of such objective tests" be a sufficient clause with the "inevitably result in" phrasing in answer D? are they both necessary then? and then how can it be "parallel"?

2. i missed it, sort of, in this question, but can i *generally rely on answers with the same strength conclusions as the question? like the "overly optimistic" could never be "inevitable"? that strategy has been being used, but i am just wondering how reliable it is … for instance, what if there was no conclusion but the question better paralleled the reasoning? or would that never even happen?

3. how am i supposed to do these questions in like a single minute? like what do i practice so i don't use up all of the "parallel reasoning" questions? should i be trying to map all of the answers?

#help

0
PrepTests ·
PT115.S1.P2.Q12
User Avatar
18lwood130
Wednesday, May 10 2023

in question 12, is c not a little broud? like it's not describing how to strategize for any legal argument –– it's specifically this one. i get how e is not a great choice because it doesn't focus on the unsoundness, but i understood e as saying "the passage shows how Thurgood Marshall's strategy could be used to show how legally, not just morally (like we all recognize that segregation is horrible but even on a legal basis it doesn't work), it fails [and thus how he utilized this strategy to win Brown v. the Board of Education"

#help

4

Confirm action

Are you sure?