@brigittesuhr417 said:
I think the next cycle will be much less competitive. I have a friend from Korea who got a major scholarship to Texas with I think a 169 and a 3.7 or something last year, and I think a 171 and lower GPA is probably just as good typically. If next year returns to the sort of results we saw last year I think you have a very good chance.
Thank you for sharing!
@ryanazr95174 said:
Pretty sure you will make it into a T14. I am international too. As long as you have good recommendations and a solid personal statement, you are probably set.
Thanks a lot for the encouragement!
So I got 171 in last Flex, but my GPA is like real low and ppl with170+ really increased a lot since Flex. Scholarship and location are not any issue if I can get into a T14. And I wonder if I can't be accepted by a T14, can I get into school like UCLA or UT-Austin?
Any opinion will be appreciated!
@jayleencouture313 said:
@3020795671qq436 said:
I recommend Manhattan. I have read Bible fisrt, and then Manhattan, the later one works better for me, the diagram is just simpler(although many the same as Bible). Personally I think LG is all about your practice and develop your own mind set, the former helps you to solve normal games and the later helps you to solve wierd games. Bc wierd games are unique, so you cannot use someone else's approach to solve it unless you genuinely know how it works, and you know the best how it works when you develop your own.
Btw, I do not think "-0 consistently" is very realistic, and it is certainly not worth the time to be obssessed with getting a -0. I believe if you can do -1~0 consistently, you do not need to worry about your LG any more.
Thanks! Have you been able to get to -0 to -1 consistently? Do you still have variations in your LG score every now and then?
Sorry I haven't replied earlier, I don't check the notification a lot. As I said LG is all about practice, and always figure out is there any way to fasten your thinking process during the br. If someone can finish a game under 5 mins, it's not he/she is smarter, but the method he/she uses is better. And yeah I still have variation in my LG, but mainly bc I am not a very strict(I'm Chinese so I am not sure if this is the right word but I think you can get it) person.
I recommend Manhattan. I have read Bible fisrt, and then Manhattan, the later one works better for me, the diagram is just simpler(although many the same as Bible). Personally I think LG is all about your practice and develop your own mind set, the former helps you to solve normal games and the later helps you to solve wierd games. Bc wierd games are unique, so you cannot use someone else's approach to solve it unless you genuinely know how it works, and you know the best how it works when you develop your own.
Btw, I do not think "-0 consistently" is very realistic, and it is certainly not worth the time to be obssessed with getting a -0. I believe if you can do -1~0 consistently, you do not need to worry about your LG any more.
Hi, I am in China but plz add me if that is fine to you. markfunglaw@haileyhester13200.com
@tallentrandall119 said:
I agree with the rest. You have a good shot at the T-14 or T-16. But it's a bit of an atypical year, so nothing is a guarantee!
Got it! Thx!