Cannot for the life of me understand this rule:
"K is advertised during one of the first two weeks."
Doesn't this mean that K cannot be in weeks 3 or 4? Wouldn't K being in either 3 or 4 (which it does, as per J.Y.'s explanation) break that rule that K has to be in the first two weeks? Am I taking this rule way too literally or something?
Thanks y'all!
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-1-game-4/
@ No worries at all!! I totally agree, it is a pretty unmemorable topic lol. The stim started by mentioning how people/surveys(?) claim that success required something (good luck, I think?) and then argued that this was wrong since success actually required hard work. It was a flaw question and I think it was trying to play on sufficient/necessary confusion, but wasn't quite sure. Sorry I don't remember much else, but hopefully it might ring a bell? Really hoping it was experimental... couldn't get a grasp on it for some reason!
@ Just a quick question, since you seemed to have only gotten 2 LRs -- do you remember having a question about success requiring hard work (flaw question, I believe)? Trying to see if that one was experimental or not... Thanks!
Does anyone remember a question about a city having to invest in some software development technology or high internet speed infrastructure if it is to remain viable? Hoping it was the experimental...
I'm having trouble translating "only" statements... can anyone help me out?
For example:
Only the best artworks are beautiful. (PT 49, Section 4, Question 16)
Since "only" is a group 2 indicator (necessary), wouldn't it be the following:
Best Artworks --> Beautiful
Or, is it:
Beautiful --> Best Artworks
Thanks for your help, guys! Much appreciated.
@ @ Thanks for the help, guys! Really grateful how awesome this community is.
@ Also, I'm assuming that the only time that "or" is not inclusive is when they specifically say "not both"? Is that a correct assumption? Or are there instances where they may not specify but the "or" is exclusive?
@ Thank you so much for the help!
I was wondering if anyone could help me out here. Always had trouble understanding this concept.
1. Say I am negating [A and B]. I know this turns to [/A or /B]. Does this or mean that BOTH A and B are out? I know it means either A is out, or B is out but can both possibly be out?
2. Conversely, if I was negating [/A and /B], I know this becomes A or B. Does this or mean that BOTH A and B could possibly be in? I know it means either A is in, or B is in, but can both possibly be in?
Not entirely sure when the "inclusive" or applies or not. Thanks a lot guys!
Just a quick question for you veteran PT takers out there... the LG sections of my PTs (all of the older ones, at least) are not formatted as they are on the modern LSAT -- meaning, each game is on a single page with little space at the bottom.
How do you guys go about replicating the real thing? Should I just make do with the little space at the bottom, or do you guys use scrap paper on the side?
@ Please tag me as well! Thanks for taking the lead for us!
-
-
@
Thanks, you are the bomb!!
@
Hey Dillon, could you add me as well? I purchased Ultimate+ a while back as well and also do not have access to the admissions package.
Thanks!
Wow, that was extremely thorough and helpful. It's people like you that made me join the 7Sage community in the first place. Thank you so much!!
@ Thanks for the clarification! If I understand you correctly though, if rule #2 does not exist, does that mean K must be in 1/2? I'm just trying to see how this rule could be understood in other games. So if in another game the rule stated that K is in 1/2, that means only 1/2, correct? Sorry if that's unclear!