Lol I cannot believe I forgot not to attack GOKU ;( I have failed you sensei!!!!

Congrats Champ!

WILD + FARMED ... its so simple but so elusive AHHH

a

Hey

1. You're reasoning is spot on. (Description of question, notes & answer explanation)

* Only thing I can recommend is to focus on correlational / causal link the writer is trying to make and attack that for these kinds of questions

2. HMU when you get to Miami 😎

Dude. Neri. You're a genius! Thank you so much, needed this so bad that I screen capped it haha

Best of luck on the LSAT my dude

Lol he said dildos

dude thank you so much

Hey Karly,

I struggled with eliminating Answer C as well here but this is kind of how I resolved the answer choices:

I think the clause "with every attempt" makes the answer choice too restrictive in that it is essentially saying that 'every time scientists / researchers will try to delineate the scope of "animal rights" they will be faced with the problem that the living organism doesn't fit concisely into the specified boundary'..

but that just can't be true in EVERY case because clearly you can delineate "animal rights", to say a cat, without the problem arising, if we define the boundary of a living organism being just mammalian four-legged creatures..

Not sure if that helps but it's how I'm trying to wrap my head around it

Also I'm trying to view this as more of an "Inference" question than a MSS question and in that light J.Y's explanation makes more sense because it's more of a logical conclusion than a strongly supported statement!