User Avatar
916329363qq30
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
User Avatar
916329363qq30
Thursday, Dec 20 2018

Thank you, my goal is 172 next Jan, but it seems too far away. I'll try to be more objective and strong.> @ said:

P.S.

I've been in your shoes. I had no idea how to improve on this test when I started studying and the internet/friends/family were providing all sorts of conflictive (usually unhelpful) advice. 2 years later, I scored a 174 and that was made possible by 7Sage materials and this community.

You can improve on this test and this community will help you. This process is a marathon not a spring. Hang in there!

User Avatar

Thursday, Dec 20 2018

916329363qq30

Help!!!!I don't know how can i break 150

I've prepared lsat for two months, i studied all the 7sage courses, some of the trainer courses. But i still couldn't see any improvement on my test score. I was stuck under 150 in my recent timed 4 PT. Without time limit, my PT score is between 155-160. My friend suggest me to take 1 PT everyday and review it. I can do that, but i couldn't see any improvement if keep doing so.

LR is my frustrated part. I watched all the course and thought i can improve a lot. But the truth is I can only get 8-13 right of each LR section. Meanwhile i will left 5-6 questions unfinished and even not read. So, the skip strategy almost doesn't applies to me. Since no matter how i skip, i still couldn't finish the questions. Most of the time, when i read the stimulus, i need to refer back to former sentences over and over again to understand the stimulus. It costs me a lot of time. Blind review is also let me angry. First, there always five choices i haven't review and to be wrong. Second even when i reviewed the questions, there're still 3-5 my reviewed answer choice still be wrong. I can understand all the explanations through video or discussion forum. But next time, i still be wrong which make me hopeless.

RC is frustrated as well. Sometimes, i can get 12-14 right this section with a whole passage left unread. In the beginning, i tried to read and whole passage before answering the questions, but it usually take 8 minutes to read each passage and turn out to be a lower correction rate. Now, i skip all the details only read the core sentences, it takes less time, but i still cannot finish the last passages.

Game is bit less than the other two sections. I can get 15-21 right in this section. There's no game i cannot solve after i watched the video. However, there are three big problems. First, i can solve doesn't mean i won't stuck. I stuck a lot on most of the games.

Second, i habitually misread or interpret the stimulus and choose the wrong answers. As a result, i miss 3-4 questions every section in this way. Third, when i try to slow down and make sure my understanding is right, i spent a lot of time and only deduct the wrong questions down to 2-3 of each section. And the result is i may not have time to proceed the last game.

Another problem is i have little sense of the time. Sometimes i feel i was fast, and only stuck a little. The truth is I'm too slow. Anyone can help me a little more about any of the question i met. I'm not clever, but i'm very diligent. And i only aim 150 for the time being.

User Avatar
916329363qq30
Thursday, Nov 15 2018

What's the mindmap software you used in the demo? That one looks pretty cool!

PrepTests ·
PT111.S1.Q15
User Avatar
916329363qq30
Tuesday, Jan 08 2019

Contrary to the answer. I don't think A and B strengthen the argument. A, though the credibility of this magazine has call into questions, how can we conclude the stem fallen into this category?

Let me use an analogy, John said Mike is a cat person. I said he is wrong. Stem asks to strengthen my argument. And the answer choice states: John usually make mistakes. So we should choose it. I didn't see any support of it!

#help (Added by Admin)

PrepTests ·
PT109.S4.Q24
User Avatar
916329363qq30
Monday, Jan 07 2019

Doesn't it R seems to attack the premise? I think it is somehow incorrect!

#help (Added by Admin)

PrepTests ·
PT102.S4.Q24
User Avatar
916329363qq30
Sunday, Jan 06 2019

Problem at hand.

The explanation is right. However, doesn't it most imply not all? So, from premise "most", we can not conclude all. I think there's another gap between Premise and conclusion that. They assume as long as one has a pet they will be unhappy? Not a causation but a condition logic in the assumption. So the A is right.

I cannot see why i'm wrong over this point!

PrepTests ·
PT101.S2.Q1
User Avatar
916329363qq30
Sunday, Jan 06 2019

Help, how can i attack the premise here? I know A is wrong but i don't know whether A attack the premise!

#help (Added by Admin)

PrepTests ·
PT101.S2.Q20
User Avatar
916329363qq30
Sunday, Jan 06 2019

often, JY says weaking a argument cannot attack the premise, i'm not clear about the A. I think it may directly attack the premise. Can someone explain how can we direct attack the Premise in this Question.

Confirm action

Are you sure?