Some feedback I believe is valuable is that no explanation should take 30 minutes. I get going in depth, but it seems to be too much sometimes.

I was left with C & D but went with D. I see why D is wrong but C doesn't seem that great either. If most dont have porous bones, it implies that some do. Maybe the ichthyosaur is one of those some that do. I assume this goes back to the spectrum of support, because C does weaken, but itself makes you draw some assumptions.

did anyone else not think this was a discrepancy? Car thefts decreasing makes sense if conviction rates are higher. Its just crazy that they made an answer choice that is correct while making it more confusing lol

I understand the answer being A if this is not conditional reasoning. "Always" is pretty much textbook CR. That would mean A is wrong because its mistaking sufficiency for necessity. Can someone explain why this is not the case?

I got this wrong on the first go through and the BR. Tried it one more time before seeing the correct answer and gasped when i saw it was A. Literally the one I thought had the least possibility all 3 times lmao

Did anyone else think that C meant that they develop the schizophrenia after the damage to the subplate in the second trimester. Not that the damage to the subplate occurred after the second trimester. A wild reach my brain for some reason defaulted to.

@fatiman123282 (E) says more than a majority of the criticisms Handel's arias receives is unwarranted. We are only talking about ONE type of criticism here: the disproportion between text and music, which many critics complain about. We concluded this particular criticism is unwarranted, but can't make a blanket statement that most criticisms are unwarranted as well.

For #5, can it also be diagrammed as kittens adopted <--s--> homes?