I ordered them correctly. I tried to be as skeptical as possible and find something wrong with each argument. My reasoning for Tiger being the strongest argument was how the author said "all other members must prostrate," meaning that Walt had to have given propitiations, or else there would be a fundamental flaw in the argument due to that must.
Just because a mammal is aggressive and can cause injury, does that fully mean it is not suitable to be a pet? What if we kept the Tiger secluded in the backyard under maximum security? What if we found mechanisms to feed and take care of the tiger without being in close proximity? While relatively unrealistic, I figured that a Tiger could still be kept as a pet under certain conditions, so the argument seemed a little weaker than Walt's.
For the Trash Bin, what if someone else tipped it over and the Cat simply ate the contents off the ground? Is licking his paw to clean his face ALWAYS preceded by having eaten? This argument, to me, had too many potential questions.
1
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I ordered them correctly. I tried to be as skeptical as possible and find something wrong with each argument. My reasoning for Tiger being the strongest argument was how the author said "all other members must prostrate," meaning that Walt had to have given propitiations, or else there would be a fundamental flaw in the argument due to that must.
Just because a mammal is aggressive and can cause injury, does that fully mean it is not suitable to be a pet? What if we kept the Tiger secluded in the backyard under maximum security? What if we found mechanisms to feed and take care of the tiger without being in close proximity? While relatively unrealistic, I figured that a Tiger could still be kept as a pet under certain conditions, so the argument seemed a little weaker than Walt's.
For the Trash Bin, what if someone else tipped it over and the Cat simply ate the contents off the ground? Is licking his paw to clean his face ALWAYS preceded by having eaten? This argument, to me, had too many potential questions.