@Kg7 Typically I will skip the video explanation and instead skim the written explanation below. I give particular attention to any answer choices that I spent extra time considering. Other times, I will watch the video section explaining the breakdown of the passage, because sometimes Jy does it in a clearer way than I did, but will then skip the answer choices if I was sure of my choice and got it quickly. Overall, the explanations are a tool to be used however you best see fit!
This question was infuriating. I quickly mapped the conditionals presenting in the stimulus out, but doubted my map for every question choice. I confused myself so deeply I got it wrong initially, but when I returned in blind review I pretty quickly picked out the correct answer choice. Good to note that in a real test environment, this would be a good contender to flag and come back to it with fresh eyes.
Is this an accurate interpretation of the last one?
If knowledge of the existence of a particular fact is an element of an offense, and they do not actually believe that it does not exist, then such knowledge is established.
Offense and /Belief it doesn't exist -> Established
I'm in Michigan and totally interested! I'd be down to meet up in the Ann Arbor area if you were looking for an in-person group!
Hey! If anyone is studying in the Ann Arbor area (MI) and wants to get together please feel free to reach out! I find it's really helpful to talk through questions sometimes, or just work in the same area for motivation!
@kimwexler I believe A is insinuating that the "stealing thunder" move has to be done shortly before that information has been revealed by the opposing side, and that doing it too early can be damaging. This is not what the passage was implying by the quotation you included. That line is simply describing "stealing thunder" and saying it may create an image of credibility.