Great idea.

Sufficient Condition: P→F (If Pat is introduced, then "Fuck Pat.")

Necessary Condition: F→P (For "Fuck Pat" to be true, Pat must be introduced.)

Conclusion: "Fuck Pat."

Imagine if (A) said "damaging."

Not "dEletErIouS."

eh

As I progress through the lesson plans without drilling different question types, encountering a new type unexpectedly becomes very challenging. I confidently chose my answer after thorough consideration and significant investment in BR to confirm it, assuming it was a WSE question. A more prominent warning when the next screen resembles the previous one would be beneficial, as I moved forward unaware of the change and did not pay enough attention to notice RRE. Discovering that my confirmed BR answer was incorrect came as a shock, only realizing the issue after when I (rarely) checked the discussion board. Everything finally clicked, but now I need to revisit the question to reassess my answer choice before watching the video. Even if my original answer would have been wrong if it were a WSE question, at least I wouldn't feel tricked. I understand it's good to practice shifting between question types, as the LSAT presents, but that's what drills and PTs are for, not the core curriculum. It's quite frustrating.