@embino Apparently

Great idea.

Imagine if (A) said "damaging."

Not "dEletErIouS."

@josephandrews108 yo what up

@Julietb07 I defiently understand but like he said, it's fair game to know that smoking cigarettes causes more cancer than it doesn't. Especially given the presumption of truth even though it's still the wrong answer choice.

@pepper-tootles-9p After watching the video, this helped so much more. Thanks!

@Andrewstine99 Wow, would you look at that? With RRE in mind, I'm sure D is the answer I would've chosen. Maybe not, however, because it was already spoiled for me.

@Andrewstine99 *I'm not prepared or ready to juggle different question types at a time, and I'm not comfortable enough to recognise the various question types. So when I'm in the groove, trying to learn my best, and it sucks, but I want to sit here for hours trying to figure out each question, I'm sure I'm not the only one who gets thrown off. So much that I now spend 15 minutes writing this out because it pissed me off. The lessons are great and the videos are explained so well, but stop unintentionally fucking me. I don't want an RRE review. I'll get back to RRE when I want to drill.

As I progress through the lesson plans without drilling different question types, encountering a new type unexpectedly becomes very challenging. I confidently chose my answer after thorough consideration and significant investment in BR to confirm it, assuming it was a WSE question. A more prominent warning when the next screen resembles the previous one would be beneficial, as I moved forward unaware of the change and did not pay enough attention to notice RRE. Discovering that my confirmed BR answer was incorrect came as a shock, only realizing the issue after when I (rarely) checked the discussion board. Everything finally clicked, but now I need to revisit the question to reassess my answer choice before watching the video. Even if my original answer would have been wrong if it were a WSE question, at least I wouldn't feel tricked. I understand it's good to practice shifting between question types, as the LSAT presents, but that's what drills and PTs are for, not the core curriculum. It's quite frustrating.

@yeasmins099444 I feel the opposite but it's okay because I'm sure you did great on other sections that I hated! We all have to practice. Good luck in your studies!

Sufficient Condition: P→F (If Pat is introduced, then "Fuck Pat.")

Necessary Condition: F→P (For "Fuck Pat" to be true, Pat must be introduced.)

Conclusion: "Fuck Pat."

eh