User Avatar
AngelDominguez
Joined
May 2026
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
154
CAS GPA
3.46
1L START YEAR
2029

Applications

UChicago
In process

Discussions

User Avatar
AngelDominguez
Thursday, Aug 6

@ahsley This format is actually so cancerous. If it's like this for me on Saturday I'm gonna crash out.

2
PrepTests ·
PT149.S1.Q9
User Avatar
AngelDominguez
Wednesday, Jul 29

@kyliepage2438 Same, the "though" sounded like a concession to me so I immediately ignored it. UGH

1
PrepTests ·
PT144.S3.Q24
User Avatar
AngelDominguez
Monday, Jul 27

@study99 I'm not sure where your confusion is here. No where in the stimulus is it ever mentioned that there could be "trace amounts of micronutrients" in the soils, only that trace amounts are needed to maintain a healthy balance.

1

I think a really cool feature would be to able to see the how your accuracy in a tag changed after taking a drill/section/PT, kind of how when you gain/lose ELO in a competitive game like chess.com.

It would really gamify the whole priorities system and give you that dopamine hit from improving your accuracy.

16
PrepTests ·
PT114.S1.Q9
User Avatar
AngelDominguez
Thursday, Jul 9

@arose We could debate about semantics all day, but in general many is mainly used as some in the LSAT. Practically, many means two or more, which is closest to the definition of some.

1
User Avatar
AngelDominguez
Saturday, Jun 13

A game for identifying question types would be cool.

13
User Avatar
AngelDominguez
Wednesday, Jun 3

@timwes21 Yeah this is a pretty big oversight. Essentially, A->B is equivalent to /A or B (also called Conditional disintegration), so When you negate (/A or B) your get (A and /B)

1
User Avatar
AngelDominguez
Tuesday, Jun 2

@JaidaAnderson I think you're confusing necessary for sufficient condition. You might have an action that benefits another and is performed with that intention, but might not be morally good. Also don't forget to apply De Morgan's law and flip the AND to and OR.

2

Confirm action

Are you sure?