User Avatar
AngelDominguez
Joined
May 2026
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 180
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
AngelDominguez
Yesterday

@timwes21 Yeah this is a pretty big oversight. Essentially, A->B is equivalent to /A or B (also called Conditional disintegration), so When you negate (/A or B) your get (A and /B)

1
User Avatar
AngelDominguez
2 days ago

@jaidaanderson I think you're confusing necessary for sufficient condition. You might have an action that benefits another and is performed with that intention, but might not be morally good. Also don't forget to apply De Morgan's law and flip the AND to and OR.

1

Confirm action

Are you sure?